The Image Index is a system based on likes received on images, that incentivizes the most active and liked members of the community. Learn more.
The Contribution Index (beta) is system to reward informative, constructive, and valuable commentary on AstroBin. Learn more.
Description: "Unclipped"/ lightened up the darkest nebula. I accidentally pulled the blacks in too much early on in the process.
Uploaded: ...
Description:
Since I am in a bit of a whirlwind of learning and experimenting with Pixinsight, I wanted to revisit this image to address two primary concerns:
-I had clipped the blacks in the darkest nebulae inadvertently in the first iteration and made a half-assed attempt to fix that that I wasn't happy with. This time I fixed this by not making that mistake while I did my initial HT stretch.
-The image suffered from an overall blue cast in the darker end of the histogram, and that doesn't seem accurate or appealing. It was especially apparent in the color of the dark nebulae, which doesn't seem accurate since so many images of dust in space seem to be more brown?
Adam Block does address the blue background issue in the NGC 1333 tutorial I referred to in my main description here. I used his technique of applying DBE to the starless image to remove the blue from the back ground. I also then used SCNR a bit on the blue (and the green, of course) to pull it down.
As I look through the History Explorer on this workflow, it seems like the starless DBE neutralized the blue that I think we'd all like to see out of the bright reflection nebula on the right of the image. The blue is gone before applying the SCNR Blue. Some natural seeming blue still remains throughout the image, (not just stars, that wouldn't count), and the stars in and around the bright reflection nebula seem to be whitish, so I wonder if this reflection nebula should actually be white? I am not sure, but honest application , ( a few times to check different results), of DBE seems to balance the blue out of this part of the image.
Another thing that I changed was to do my initial DBE after PCC, counter to current conventional wisdom as I understand it. I don't have a lot of gradients in my integration, and I was getting weird results from doing DBE first, even after trying various approaches and selection placements and numbers in DBE.
DBE and Background Neutralization, (applied during PCC in my case), are powerful tools and I've seen so many folks, either blythely or expertly(?), apply them in a seemingly haphazard way. When I experiment with them I can get very different results with small changes. I hope to develop better familiarity with them so that the results I get are consistent and desirable. I think especially with a field full of nebula, with very little actual background, it seems hard to use them to affect only the background.
I think this version seems more refined than the previous, and holds up better in the small details if I zoom in.
Uploaded: ...
Description: Darkened slightly, fixed bright star halo.
Uploaded: ...
Description:
Today I learned about the complication of needing use the ICCTransformation Process before saving and image as a PNG in Pixinsight.
Most of my processing to date has been finalized in Photoshop that renders PNGs that look like the PSD file. This is not true for Pixinsight. There is a good tutorial here: https://www.lightvortexastronomy.com/tutorial-preparing-images-for-publication.html
Uploaded: ...
Title: My first APOD!
Description:
I've only submitted for an APOD twice, and my second time was a charm!
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap221130.html
Uploaded: ...
Description:
Upon some prodding, and because of my own obsessiveness, I wanted to correct the color of LBN 524, the reflection nebula on the right hand side of the image.
My earlier iterations had shown this as blue. PCC, and/or maybe the way I was applying Background Neutralization, was yielding a blue cast to the whole image which I was trying to correct, but this caused the loss of the blue in this reflection nebula, (see my previous revision description for more details). A cursory application of the new SPCC yielded a pale blue reflection nebula, but not as much of a blue cast to the whole image.
Because I was otherwise pretty happy with the rest of this image, I used a previous iteration to mask the blue nebula into the final iteration rather than completely reprocessing using SPCC. I think I was able to get this to look pretty natural and a true representation of the colors of all the nebula.
Uploaded: ...
Title: Reprocessed from original integration
Description:
This object is a real challenge to work on. There are so many different colors in the nebula, and a lot of different stuff going on, so it always feels a bit "too much".
I shot and processed this originally just before SPCC was released, so I was using PCC. I didn't trust the colors I had originally, thinking I had screwed something up, (DBE maybe?), and made the background too blue. In my zeal to neutralize the blue, I tweaked the whole thing towards yellow/orange, which wasn't really correct. I then was assured by others that the reflection nebula on the right should be blueish since it is illuminated by a blue star. My futzing had washed out the blue from this area. To band-aid this I had originally adjusted a layer in Photoshop and painted through a mask. Super cattywampus.
I wanted to reprocess this using not only SPCC, but BlurX and some other new-to-me tools, and trusting that that the colors in the dark areas here are actually in the blues. Additionally, since I have been reprocessing a lot of older data I have become more familiar and comfortable with a lot of PI processes and techniques.
This version definitely treats the fine details better, and I think the color is more correct.
I did rely on Photoshop a bit more than usual to correct/balance some background brightnesses (darknesses) that may have resulted from a less-than-optimal application of DBE. I did, however, successfully protect the dark nebulae in the object throughout the processing well with GAME Script generated masks. I think I really nicely retained some dynamic range in those dark areas.
I reduced stars a second time because the stars add to the overall chaos and I think the image benefits from less pronounced stars. Hopefully the late-process star reduction didn't screw anything up like the last time I used it. I looked closely and I think it's OK.
Since there is so much going on here, please take some time to zoom in on the max-resolution version and see what you can!
Uploaded: ...
Description: Applied some masked HDRMT to improve contrast in brightest core and reflection nebulae on the right.
Uploaded: ...
This page or operation is not available at the moment, because AstroBin is in READ ONLY mode. For more information, please check out our Twitter feed: https://twitter.com/AstroBin_com
This feature is only offered at higher membership levels.
Would you be interested in upgrading? AstroBin is a very small business and your support would mean a lot!
This feature is only offered at the AstroBin Ultimate membership level.
Would you be interested in upgrading? AstroBin is a very small business and your support would mean a lot!
Only group members can post in a group's forum.
Please join or request to join the group, and then you'll be able to post a new topic.
If this user has been harassing you, and you shadow-ban them, all their activities on your content will be invisible to everyone except themselves.
They will not know that they have been shadow-banned, and the goal is that eventually they will get bored while having caused no harm, since nobody saw what they posted.
This operation will reload the current page. If you have any unsaved information in a form, it will be lost.
You can also dismiss this window, and your operation will be applied at the next page navigation.
This operation cannot be undone!
When you report abuse on some content on AstroBin, the content will be hidden until a moderator reviews it. Abuse reports are anonymous and the content's owner will not be notified.
Please specify a reason for this abuse report.
Please note: The following tables are updated every 24 hours.
Distinct awarded users | Total awarded images | |
---|---|---|
Image of the day | ||
Top picks | ||
Top pick nominations |
Image of the day | Top pick | Top pick nominations | Total submitted | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Deep sky | ||||
Solar system | ||||
Extremely wide field | ||||
Star trails | ||||
Northern lights | ||||
Noctilucent clouds | ||||
Landscape |
Image of the day | Top pick | Top pick nominations | Total submitted | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Backyard | ||||
Traveller | ||||
Own remote observatory | ||||
Amateur hosting facility | ||||
Public amaeteur data | ||||
Professional, scientific grade data | ||||
Mix of multiple sources | ||||
Other | ||||
Unknown |
Please note: You are on a Free account, and when you delete an image, your upload counter does not decrease (unless the image is deleted within 24 hours of uploading it). The Free account is not a way to keep your most recent or best 10 images on AstroBin, but a trial period for you to decide whether or not a paid subscription is worth it. For more information, please click here.
The image will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered. All its revisions will be deleted too. Are you sure?
You will delete all other revisions (if any), and the originally uploaded image, leaving the current revision as the final and only version of this image.
You will delete all revisions, leaving the originally uploaded image as the final and only version of this image.
The “AstroBin Image of the Day and Top Picks”, or IOTD/TP, is a long-running system to promote beautiful, interesting, peculiar, or otherwise amazing astrophotographs, with a focus on technical excellence. Learn more.
Submitted The date and time when you submitted this image for IOTD/TP consideration. | ... |
---|---|
Views by Submitters (available since September 19th, 2023) Every image is assigned to 50% of available Submitters. In the event that at least 80% of them don't view the image before its time in the IOTD/TP process expires, it's assigned to the other 50% of Submitters and the process begins anew. | |
Promotions by Submitters When 3 distinct Submitters promote the image, it moves on to the next stage of the process: evaluation for Top Pick status. This requirement, in addition to anonymization of images and distribution to only a subset of them, prevents biases and ensures that the best images are selected. | |
Promotions by Reviewers When 3 distinct Reviewers promote the image, it moves on to the next stage of the process: evaluation for IOTD status. | |
Early dismissal Staff members have a lot of images to inspect on a daily basis, and they can dismiss images if they believe they don't meet the requirements for IOTD/TP selection. If an image is dismissed 5 times, it's removed from the process. This streamlines the process and ensures that any bias present in promotions could be overruled by other staff members. |
This image cannot be submitted for the IOTD/TP consideration.
Reason:
You are not authenticated. Please log in.
Status | Advanced success |
Started | ... |
Astrometry.net job | 7382501 |
PixInsight job | 2JBAA6MMI6JZ1MD5XBKF2YDDWVGP6KTX |
PixInsight queue size | n/a |
PixInsight stage | TASK_LOG |
RA (center) | 22h58m04s.42 |
RA (top/left) | 23h01m20s.91 |
RA (top/right) | 22h48m57s.35 |
RA (bottom/right) | 22h55m00s.80 |
RA (bottom/left) | 23h07m14s.82 |
Dec (center) | +62°29′54″.0 |
Dec (top/left) | +63°29′19″.2 |
Dec (top/right) | +62°26′01″.0 |
Dec (bottom/right) | +61°30′13″.2 |
Dec (bottom/left) | +62°31′25″.3 |
Comments